Why We're Different

Look, we all know the struggle. You're competing with TikTok, Snapchat, and a thousand other things vying for your students' attention. Meanwhile, you're supposed to help them care about the Constitutional Convention or the causes of World War I. That's why we've built The History Cat, a curriculum that doesn't make you choose between rigor and student engagement. 

 

One of the biggest consequences of this bite-sized media culture has been the decline in reading and comprehension. Many publishers adapted to this trend with a "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" approach. So the materials got shorter. Then shorter still. Until reading has nearly disappeared entirely and got replaced with a 60 second video. We think that's the wrong move.

​

The research on attention and memory is pretty clear: bite-sized content produces bite-sized thinking. Deep reading builds the cognitive stamina students need for college, careers, and real life. And so, we went the other direction on purpose. Every History Cat article is written for depth and historical accuracy, but in a voice that speaks to actual teenagers. Causal language. Quirky analogies. Well-placed humor. We're all about engagement through good storytelling—because length without voice is just punishment.

​

We also know that reading levels vary wildly in every classroom. That's why we're building in audio voiceovers, so students who struggle with decoding or process better through listening can access the same rich content as their peers. 

​​

​

Where the Real Learning Happens

Here's where History Cat really differs from traditional textbook curriculum: we build understanding through intentional, standards-based scaffolding that moves students from foundational knowledge all the way up to complex historical thinking. By the end of a lesson, if students aren't solving problems and finding historical patterns, then they've missed out on real learning opportunities. And that's not happening on our watch. 

​

Every article includes quick knowledge checks and ends with DOK 1–2 comprehension questions—cognitive speed bumps that confirm students actually understood what they read before they move on to analyzing it.

​

The articles lay the foundation. What comes next is where the real work happens:

• Historical Simulations — Students join a fractured abolitionist council in 1850 and have to create a plan to end slavery; or they manage a family budget during the Great Depression and make the same impossible choices real families faced.

• Structured Debates — Were the Sons of Liberty freedom fighters or terrorists? Students defend a position with evidence drawn from Patriot and Loyalist primary sources.

• Decision-Making Scenarios — Instead of taking notes on redlining, students become residents of a fictional neighborhood and watch the policy dismantle it in real time — facing the same competing priorities and impossible choices that real people faced, with no easy way out.

• Digital Games and Escape Rooms — Students navigate the Underground Railroad or investigate a Cold War crisis with problem solving and historical thinking baked into every decision.

• CER Writing Tasks — Instead of summarizing the Trail of Tears, students dig into the political reasoning, economic motives, and state sovereignty arguments that made removal possible — then construct a written argument about how a policy that brutal got justified.

​

When students do that kind of work, patterns emerge on their own. The Civil War stops being an inevitable event on a timeline and starts looking like a failure of people to solve a problem—which raises an uncomfortable question: where else have we seen that?

​

​

Our Take on AI in the Classroom

Your students are already using AI. Pretending otherwise is silly. And honestly? It can be a remarkable tool for learning and discovery — but only if there's something solid underneath it. Students who've wrestled with complex texts, argued from primary sources, and constructed evidence-based CER responses know how to use AI critically and creatively. Students who haven't are just outsourcing their thinking to a chatbot. Our curriculum is designed to build that foundation first.

​

​

The Bottom Line

You need a history curriculum that meets standards without feeling like test prep, challenges your advanced students without losing your struggling readers, and actually makes kids want to know what happened next. History Cat was built to do all of that—at a price that doesn't require a grant application.

​

​

Let's build better historians together.